Mohamed Ahmady Abdelrahman Ahmed , Ahmed Ahmed Hussein Elfek And Ahmed Mohamed Hosney,

ABSTRACT
Background: The Present Study Was Performed To Evaluate Immediate Implant Placement With Socket-shield Technique By Bone Trephine Bur Versus Conventional Technique In Maxillary Aesthetic Zone. Methods: Patients Were Randomly Divided In To Two Groups:For Group A: Immediate Implant With Socket-shield Technique By Surgical Bur. For Group B: Immediate Implant Placement With Socket-shield Technique By Trephine Bur. After Surgery Each Patient Were Evaluated As Follows: Pain (VAS), Peri-implant Infections With Suppuration, Implant Stability, Marginal Bone Height And Bone Density Around The Implant At Interval 3, 6 Months.

Results: In The Present Study, Clean Cut: Trephine Group Showed A High Clean Cut (100.0%) Than Conventional (bur) Group (62.5%). Trephine Group No Chance To Harm Adjacent Teeth (0.0%) Than Conventional (bur) Group That Has (25.0 %) To Harm Adjacent Teeth. At 1, 2, 3 And 6 Months; There Was No Statistically Significant Difference In Mean Marginal Bone Loss And Mean Bone Density Measurements In The Two Groups. Conclusion: Socket Shield Represents A Promising Technique To Preserve The Extraction Site Associated With Implant Placement. By Using The Trephine, A Circular Clean Cut Is Obtained. Trephine Group Showed A Less Time Of Operation Than Conventional (bur) Group.