Ahmed Abdelmegeed Mashaly, Abdul Moneim Tawfik Gadallah And Wael Mohamed Saied,

ABSTRACT


Purpose: The Aim Of This Study Was To Compare The Clinical And Radiographic Outcomes Between Immediate Loaded Basal Compression Screw Implants And Conventional Screw Implants.

Materials and Methods: The Study Comprised 16 Patients Who Were Randomly Assigned Into 2 Equal Groups. Group I Patients Received Basal Implants While Group II Patients Received Conventional Implants. All Implants Were Immediately Loaded At 3 Days After Placement. All Patients Were Evaluated Clinically Regarding: Implant Stability At 3 Days, 1, 3 And 6. Pri-implant Probing Depth (PD) , And Radiographically Regarding Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) At 1, 3 And 6 Months After Loading.

Results: During The Follow Up Period Of 6 Months, The Success Rate Of The Groap 1 Was 100% And Groap 2 Was 38.5%. The 16 Patients Were Attended The Recalls Of The Follow Up To The End Time Of The Period Of The Study. No Postoperative Complications Were Shown And Successful Implant Signs Of Osseointegration Without Any Failure Signs (soft Tissue Dehiscence, Infection Or Loosening Of Implants) Except The Failed Conventional Implants, Significant Difference Was Found When We Compared Between Both Groups. Conclusion: Basal Implant Is Can Be Immediately Loaded In Single Stage With Minimally Invasive Flapless Surgery And Minimal Surgical Complications In Atrophic Posterior Maxilla Instead Of Use Of Sinus Augmentation Due To Its High Cost And Long Time Of Waiting.