Sally Mansour, Dina F. Ahmed And Mohamed M. Elsorougy,
ABSTRACT
Objectives: Assement Of Accuracy Of Maxillary And Mandibular Angular Measurements Using Varying Electric Potential Difference (kVp) In Comparison With Real Measurements.
Methodology: In This Study, 23 Skulls Were Used. 2 Angles Were Measured For Each Side. The First Angle To Be Measured Was The Angle Of The Mandible, Which Is The Angle Formed By The Intersection Of The Posterior Border Of The Ramus With The Inferior Border Of The Mandible. The Second Angle Was The Angle Formed By The Intersection Of The Zygomatic Arch And The Temporal Process Of The Zygomatic Bone. The Skulls, Attached To Their Mandibles, Were Radiographed Using Planmeca ProMax 3D Mid CBCT Machine Using 8 MA, (?20cm X 17 Cm) Field Of View (FOV) And 400 �m Voxel Size At An Exposure Time Of 27 Seconds, With 3 Different KVp Settings 90, 80 And 60. Real Measurements Were Performed Using A Goniometer By Two Experienced Radiologists At Two Weeks Interval. Intra- And Inter-observer Agreement Was Assessed By Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman Plot Was Used To Show The Agreement Between Two Quantitative Measurements.
Results: There Was Excellent Inter And Intra-observer Reliability For All Measurements Ranging From- ICC (0.945 To 0.991) Except For A Very Good Agreement Result Of Zygomatic Angle Measurement Using (60 KVp) With Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) (0.896 ). According To Bland-Altman Statistical Test There Was Excellent Correlation Between Measurements At ( 90-80-60 KVp) And Real Measurements .
Conclusion: Maxillary And Mandibular Angular Measurements Driven From CBCT Images Of Planameca Promax 3D Mid? Machine Using 60, 80, 90 KVp Are Accurate And Reliable For All Maxillofacial Applications.